Tag Archives: Blushing Groom

Menow Versus Bull Lea

“What is the overall scope of influence of Menow on modern pedigrees?” If you ask that question of the average devotee of pedigrees, the answer would be something like the following: “Well, Menow sired Tom Fool. And Tom Fool sired … Continue reading

Posted in phalaris | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Seattle Slew, Danzig, Blushing Groom

I have been trying to come up with a snappy introduction to today’s topic. Unsuccessfully. So let me just state that I find the broodmare sire of the broodmare sire (P6 in the fourth generation) a fascinating position in pedigrees. … Continue reading

Posted in Seattle Slew | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Comment Upon “You Learn Something New Every Day”

I received the following comment on my recent post, “You Learn Something New Every Day.” ——————————————————————————————————— David, as you know as well as anyone, genuinely positive proof of inbreeding success has long proven to be highly elusive and scant at … Continue reading

Posted in La Troienne | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Signifying Nothing

Here are the results for the 11 sires duplicated (4×4 or closer) most often among sales foals of 2008-2111. APPPSW stands for average Performance Points per stakes winner, a measure of the quality of stakes winners involved, the benchmark now … Continue reading

Posted in Seattle Slew | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fappiano and Secretariat????

The effectiveness (or lack thereof) of inbreeding depends to some extent on the name duplicated. This was demonstrated a few posts ago with respect to inbreeding 3×3 or closer to Mr. Prospector. So I decided to take a look at … Continue reading

Posted in Seattle Slew, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment